License Class Converted Per 97.21A34/25/2021
What exactly does: Converted Per 97.21a3 Mean My wife just renewed and this statement is on her new license.It could be that she had a tech license that was renewed as a tech.The Plus indicated that the holder of the license had passed the CW examination.To receive credit for the written General test (Element 3) a person who held a Tech before March 21, 1987, must appear at a VE session, fill out the paperwork and pay any fee required by the VEC.
This will help provide some path through the edit history to see which sections morphed. -- StuffOfInterest 11:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC). If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project andor contribute to the discussion. Amateur radio Wikipedia:WikiProject Amateur radio Template:WikiProject Amateur radio amateur radio articles. The information jumps around in date without specifying when it is talking about. Class Converted Per 97.21A3 Code Technician LicenseAnonym1ty 20:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC) The section makes it appear as though The no-code technician license was introduced in 1987 when it was introduced in the early 1990s Anonym1ty 20:28, 6 March 2007 (UTC). The common misconsception is that they are ( ) extra lights - for getting a Extra class license and not having to do any code. That choice was not because of the operator not wanting to take the test or the FCC, but because the rest of the world had moved on and did not require it. Before 1958 the ARRL made the rules for the whole world of amateur radio. Our problem was that we saved France in WW II - but they didnt want to be saved from the Germans. They were actually in bed with the Germans and liked things the way they were. After the war, the resentment was so great, they started their own ITU - International Telegraphy Union and ignored what the ARRL said and did and demanded their own set of rules and governing body. If a old ham was so smart, they would have taken advantage of the new standards and upgraded to Amateur Extra and not stayed at General or Advanced. It pretty much proves that - that class of license was about as far as they were qualified to advance to. First - to perpetuate code - so when they are old, they will still have someone to code with. And to segegrate themselves from everyone else by thinking that it somehow makes them better - just because they learned code, or passed a multiple guess code test. A change would bea ppropriate. Jay Maynard 19:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC). Another user here blew it all away because of one line which was removed, which suggested that the Advanced Class existed prior to 1964. If anyone has any proof that Advanced predates Incentive Licensing, lets work it into the article instead of just blowing everything away. Novice and Tech were introduced in the early 1950s, and Advanced was present (but not issued) since that era, as well. Before relying on faulty memory, why not refer to actual sources How much time did you spend reading the QST discussion of the license changes from that era (I did, more than I should, rather than actually doing the college work I should have been.) -- Jay Maynard 09:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC). This article is very complex and difficult to work, mainly because there are few sources. I have focused on reorganizing and matching up the pieces that were already in the article. I plan to merge it with the live article after 10 days (March 22nd). I did do a little formatting cleanup down in the refernces section. One suggestion, if possible, when you are ready to bring the new text in, please merge it in a section at a time rather than a whole sale copypaste of the entire article. StuffOfInterest 11:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |